Repositório RCAAP

The research analyzes the application of good faith in federal administrative process. Checks the influence in the process of the categories of fact (in the existence, validity and effectiveness), law (rule, principle and postulate) and value (formal axiology and material). Talks on the good faith in civil procedure (linked to its antithesis, litigation of bad faith) and administrative law (attached to his public image, morality). Seek to understand the broad administrative process, on grounds of procedural phases of law 9.784/99. Talks about the responsibility of the duty to cooperate in the exercise of administrative function. The study is documentary and theoretical. The methodological procedure used is the deduction and argumentation theory. The content analysis, linked to the type of desk research and historical method, involves understanding the merits (substantial ideas surrounding ethics) of the primary sources (Constitution and law 5.869/73 and 9.784/99). In this way, the administrative procedure constitutes analysis unit of this dissertation and the pursuit of collaboration lies in the justification of this stub. The result, logical reasoning, found the existence of a categorical imperative in cooperation.

This study aims to position itself with respect to the possibility of intervention of the Judiciary in the contracts of private health care as a means effective for obtaining the fair balancing of interests securitized by the users and providers of health insurance in the light of the right to health and legitimate expectations generated from these contracts. In fact, the health plan contract is in Brazilian society, an instrument of paramount importance to ensure access to medical, hospital, due, notably, the failure of public health care. However, given the nature of this business adhesion legal and contractual position of dependence occupied by the user, there is a submission existential interest the right to health the achievement of equity interest profit taking which enables therefore the adoption of abusive practices by health plan operators. Thus, by carrying out documentary and bibliographical research and the adoption of deductive methodology was used, it will seek to demonstrate the legitimacy of the provocation of the Judiciary so that compliance with the fundamental right to health and social values of contract law, is imposed on the adequacy of the bond obligatory reformulating contractual vitiated imbalance/abusiveness or even determine its withdrawal from the contract, to obtain the substantial justice of the covenant and, as a result, the care of their existential purpose.

L État Démocratique de Droit doit promouvoir la vivance et convivance humain avec dignité et harmonie. Le principal vecteur pour cette réalisation est la garantie au cityoen la participation effective en exercice des fonctions d État, en spécial l activité administratif. Cette étude vise à comprendre le droit à la participation populaire dans le système juridique brésilien, avec l\'adoption de trois critères d\'analyse: d\'abord, dans le cadre d\'enquêtes de nature constitutionnelle juridiques établies dans la Constitution de 1988, qui soutiennent la participation populaire comme un droit fondamental. Deuxièmement, dans le domaine de l\'administration publique afin d\'établir sa relation avec processualité administrative. Enfin, dans l\' institut de l audience publique, en particulier sur la réglementation introduite par la loi 9.784/99, pour vérifier l\'efficacité sociale de la participation.

Actualmente, la sociedad tiene vivenciado un constante proceso tecnológico que también ha producido influjos en la esfera criminal. El aumento macizo de la preocupación con la minimización de los riesgos globales se refleja en una expansión del Derecho Penal para la protección de intereses antes impensados por las escuelas clásicas. En la tentativa de satisfacer tales pretensiones, el uso de mecanismos dogmáticos polémicos y la búsqueda por una tutela efectiva en la protección de esos nuevos intereses, en detrimento, muchas veces, de garantías penales solidificadas desde las conquistas iluministas, se ha demostrado como una realidad global. En ese contexto, emerge como importante cuestión la verificación de cuáles serían los límites del jus puniendi estatal, o, mejor diciendo, si ese poder de criminalizar conductas estaría respetando los límites impuestos por un Estado Democrático de Derecho. Cupo a la teoría del bien jurídico, sobre todo después de la Segunda Guerra, la función crítica de limitar el poder de punir del Estado. Esa concepción, hoy de alguna manera decadente en algunos países de Europa, aún encuentra grandes adeptos en el territorio brasileño, siendo tal, ambiente fértil para una discusión realista y de fundamental importancia, con vista a los peligros de un Estado detentor de un poder ilimitado. En ese sentido, el presente trabajo, utilizándose de un raciocinio deductivo y de vasta investigación bibliográfica, nacional y extranjera, tiene como objetivo evidenciar el importante papel del concepto de bien jurídico en el Derecho Penal, pero reconociendo la insuficiencia del concepto para desempeñar la función de fundamento de legitimidad del Derecho Penal de modo que no impida que esa área jurídica presente la dinamicidad necesaria para atender a las nuevas necesidades de la sociedad actual.

À l'époque contemporaine, les discussions sur le développement imprègnent l'agenda politique mondial, étant donné que les impacts à la fois la pratique et l'absence de politiques publiques de développement se chevauchent les frontières nationales, ce qui implique, par conséquent, à formuler des propositions dans transnationale. Cependant, il faut analyser les fondements de le droit au développement, en cherchant à comprendre les éléments de cette étude, la formation et l'évolution de ce domaine du droit au niveau international.

En este estudio se analiza el sistema de revisión judicial de la constitucionalidad y abstracta por intermedio de la denuncia de violación del precepto fundamental (ADPF), como instrumento de eficacia social y jurídica de los derechos sociales fundamentales y de la supresión de las omisiones legislativas. La tesis se divide en tres capítulos. En el primer capítulo, es la contextualización de los derechos sociales fundamentales en un Estado Democrático de Derecho en la Constitución de 1988, hacendo el estudio de la naturaleza y clasificaciones y abordando la carga axiológica de los derechos y garantías en el ordenamiento jurídico. También se analiza la relación entre el principio de separación de poderes y la efectividad de los derechos sociales fundamentales. El segundo capítulo, aborda acerca de las categorías de análisis de aplicabilidad y integridad de las normas constitucionales, así como de la justiciabilidad y de los límites de actuación del Poder Judicial en la área de las omisiones legislativas. Trae consideraciones acerca de la Teoría General del Derecho Público, específicamente acerca de la aplicabilidad consagradoras de los derechos sociales fundamentales, además de esclarecer el contexto de legitimación de la jurisdicción constitucional en relación à efetividad de los derechos sociales. En el tercer capítulo, se estudia el modelo brasileño de la revisión judicial de la constitucionalidad, centrándose en la denuncia de violación del precepto fundamental como herramienta para garantizar la efectividad de los derechos sociales fundamentales. Por lo tanto, es incursión acerca de la adecuación de ADPF como instrumento procesual experto en protección de los derechos sociales frente a las omisiones legislativas. Hace el análisis de la ADPF º 45, discutiendo la dimensión política de la jurisdicción constitucional asignada a STF y la relación entre la retórica de la reserva del posible y la omisión legislativa en la área del derecho a la salud.

The work on display is about the fundamental social right to food, whose analysis will be on their legal and constitutional setting, focusing on defining its contours legal-dogmatic, as well as the possible interference of the judiciary in the context of realization of this right . In order to collaborate in the construction of a social theory of the fundamental right to food from the general theory of fundamental social rights, several issues concerning the general theory were explored in early labor giving support specific approach around the right to supply. The research herein presented is of type theory, the view that realization is guided in bibliographic material that deals with the subject in vogue, and has used the deductive method of analysis, because the study is located in a general plan and abstract, from which you can certainly draw conclusions for specific situations. As an indication of possible results, it can be said that the right to food, it is a fundamental social right and was even elevated to this category on the legislative level by Constitutional Amendment. 64/2010, fulfilling therefore lead to effect its accomplishment, which may subsist under the Judiciary, behold the legitimacy of their interference in this endeavor is justified by the fact that the principle of human dignity represents the core and normative basis of the right to food, so that the realization of this right represents a constitutional mandate.

Law is the science that deals with the regulation of all aspects of human behavior. Questions dividend , social , family, economic , humanitarian , evaluative , finally , nothing escapes the control of a legal prescription that has in the Act , in a broad sense , its formulation essential. Stanchion with this premise , and considering all the legal rules incident in the relations between citizens and Government Executive / management, is that it gave the line of scientific research in focus . Accordingly , the aim of the research is on the screen to confirm the hypothesis that the observance of the principle of popular participation is , in fact, a fundamental right capable of achieving in practice , other fundamental rights worth up to do so, the vehicle of the administrative process within the three spheres of the Brazilian federation . Considering the methodological aspect , the research was guided by the following methodology: a) with respect to the objectives , the work took the form exploratory in that it undertook a thorough analysis of legal texts , jurisprudential understandings and field research with relation to the main theme , in order to clarify the impact of legislation and the exercise of jurisdiction in terms of the effectiveness of fundamental social rights in the lives of citizens, and the reflections generated by these technical sources on extrajudicial , b ) as the technical procedures , the typology of research followed mainly the way literature . With regard to the methods employed in the present study , preference was given to the following : a) the method of dialectical approach , the investigation of phenomena that are processed through the dialectic itself inside the body social , b ) method monographic procedure because the proposal was to be able to investigate the problem in bounded maximum possible aspects surrounding it . The problems faced in this research refers to the legitimacy of the acts of public officials against Brazilian citizens ( recipients of primary public interest ) , with the direct assistance of the principle of popular participation and administrative process in varied demands presented diuturnamente administratively . Anyway , it is believed that the work to be performed may become benefits to society , as it will provide the same scientific data , especially in the area procedural administrative as well as academic and law professionals , contributing to the evolution cultural collective consciousness regarding the legal relations carried out between the Government and the social body .

This paper aims to point out an understanding about the simultaneous families phenomenon in contemporary Brazilian Law. The family, once a specific form of human aggregation which assures the survival of its members, changed throughout life cycles, cultural contexts and interpersonal conflicts and it has still gone through transformations that corresponded to changes in the society. Family thus figures as a changeable entity, since it has been modifying and organizing itself, and that s why is difficult to identify family as an unique or ideal model. In the classical system established by the Brazilian Civil Codification of 1916, the familiar model was designed from an institutional perspective of family, with a patriarchal and hierarchical character. Thus, the protection of the familiar entity was solely centered on the matrimony. Traditional Brazilian Civil Law is absorbing renovations with the purpose of readapt its usage to the contemporary facts and to the new social phenomenon, aiming the resolution of the irregularities and conflicts, especially in the family relationships field. Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988, which was a milestone in the recognition of changes in Brazilian Family Law, acknowledged the pluralism in the formation of families and also the new conception of family. Families are thus entities considered egalitarian, decentralized, democratic and mainly based on bonds of affection. However, the family models referred to in Brazilian legal system are still not enough to attend the social demand of the dynamism of human relations. In this context, this study focuses on the concept of plural families in modern family life, in which polygamous families are embedded, with the goal to demonstrate that a systematic interpretation of the Brazilian legal system, notably in the terms and principles of the Constitutional Civil Order, points out the acknowledgment and attribution of legal effect to these family entities still so discriminated.

Contemporary society is marked by an acceleration process of industrial development from the radicalization of the precepts established by the industrial revolution. This whole process goes on a collision course with the individualistic rationalism of the period of enlightenment, causing the collapse of the idea of control and security that guide our social organization. The breakdown of these social paradigms ultimately determine a transformation process of criminal law to meet the new realities of contemporary society at risk. From this premise, the work based on research literature on risk society, contemporary criminal law, legal rights and crimes of abstract danger seek to contextualize the formation of risk society, from the thought of Ulrich Beck and his differentiation between modernization traditional and reflexive modernization, look - albeit briefly - some of the problems created new social patterns of risk imposed by society and the impact of the risk society on the legal system, especially on criminal law as an element of risk management. In this context, we must say that the consolidation of the risk society is, in criminal matters, the development of a new role of criminal law. The diversity and social complexity of criminal law give the thankless task of guiding the sorting order of social life by establishing new guidelines to control risk through the creation of normative demands for security. Urs Kindhauser even claims that the criminal law to be converted, in contemporary society, a criminal law as a form of security to address the risks created by hipercomplexização. In this area, we investigate the new concept of legal interest, from an individualistic conception until a design supraindividual. It is from these perspectives that the crimes of abstract danger take a new dimension. In a century that was marked by the idea of minimalism we see the increasing use of criminal crimes of abstract danger. This form of legal protection of property is not as a novelty within the legal system, but the legitimacy of its use should be analyzed to the extent that the technique allows the anticipation of the penal protection. Based on these assumptions, the paper try to analyze the various concepts that crimes of abstract danger theories assume classical, neoclassical, finalists, and especially in post finalist. There is also the concern of this technique to examine whether our model reconciles constitutionalist.

As can be seen in the history of political and institutional transitions occurred in Brazil , the construction of the national democratic reality , not always occurred within a context in which the fundamental rights and guarantees were observed and respected by established authorities. Actually, the transition periods were not able to stop the advance of power by dominant groups in order to provide the popular sectors greater democratic participation in the construction of the Brazilian political and legal system. Therefore, this paper demonstrates, based on the judgment of ADPF 153 by the Supreme Court, like the brazilian state authorities are still hostages of dominant interests at the expense of a broader action in favor of the lower classes. To better understand what it is that judgment, it is demonstrated that the goal of ADPF 153 was require interpretation according to the Constitution the law 6.683/79, which granted amnesty to end the dictatorship both those who acted on behalf of the regime, such as those countered if the military government. The purpose of making the interpretation according to the Constitution of that law had the intention to exclude from the amnesty process the agents of repression who committed numerous crimes in favor of the dictatorial government, with a view that can never be configured as political crimes, considering that these are behaviors that violate human rights. Although it has served to broaden the debate, the trial ADPF 153 exposed the existing bonds in Brazilian institutions in respect to confronting issues of class, since the military regime in Brazil was characterized as the imposition of a government whose main purpose was to protect the interests of dominant groups who were threatened with the implementation of social policies occurred by labor leaders during the 1950s and 1960s. In this context, it is essential to demonstrate the need to build a suitable transitional justice to the consolidation of a democratic regime, by filing its dimensions and prosecution of criminal prosecution against those who committed crimes against humanity during the period in which the military were in power. For that, it is necessary to recognize the impact of international human rights treaties over domestic law, so that it is possible to implement measures that seek the ultimate breakup of the most authoritarian stage of history. Furthermore, this study, despite observing the maintenance of an authoritarian state bias in driving, even after the return of civilian government to power, also aims to analyze the small steps that can be checked with respect to the policies adopted in relation to victims of the dictatorship, such as facilitation payments arising from civil reparations. Finally, it notes the need to build on the limitations of the judiciary, a transitional process with the participation of groups representing the demands of civil society, as collective actors that are represented by social movements and the political leaders who are committed to democratic development.

This work aim to analyze whether the Judiciary own institutional prerogatives to effectively ensure the liberty rights in system of crisis, using, as a pattern, the experiences of Brazilian military dictatorship during the period of 1964 to 1979. For this, it is observed that, when is valid a crisis system, understood as a form of extraordinary legality, is not allowed neither to suppress rights nor that democracy be converted into an authoritarian order and, for that, it is essential the jurisdictional control to repress abuses and illegality, committed mainly by state agents. However, using as a pattern the 1964 Brazilian authoritarian regime, it is observed that the Judiciary was used as an instrument to support the regime, because its institutional prerogatives was annulled; the ministers of the Supreme Court were gradually being replaced by regime supporters and also the Judiciary did not oppose the dictatorship directly, by declaring the unconstitutionality of its institutional acts. After the dictatorship, there was no criminal prosecution of state agents, who committed infractions, and the search for truth and the redemption of the memory is still incipient. This historical example contributes to verify that, within the crisis system, should not only be increased the Executive and the Legislature prerogatives, but also the Judiciary s for the purpose of repressing state acts that extrapolate crisis measures, by providing the Courts and prosecutors a greater investigative powers. Another conclusive hypothesis is the necessity to relativize paradigms, once made sacred in times of normality, such as the presumption of veracity and legitimacy of the government acts and, moreover, the canals of justice access must be kept open, forbidding suspending procedural guarantees. This study also indicates that the Courts must intensify the supervision of the State acts, requiring the presentation of clear information about the crisis measures and, above all, they must punish, in civil, criminal and administrative instances, illegalities committed by agents of the state to demonstrate that extreme violations of rights or suppression of the democratic order are not applicable in the validity of the constitutional crises system. Therefore, the Judiciary has the capacity to ensure the freedom rights in crisis system, however, for the effectiveness of this control, legislative changes are required to increase the prerogatives of the Courts, as well as an adaptation of jurisprudence, adjusted to the reality of crisis.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Starting from the Social Security system outlined in the Brazilian Constitution of 1988, this study aims to examine the content, the fundamentals and the impact of the constitutional reforms in the social security, specifically the amendments nº 20/98, nº 41/03 and nº 47/05, as well as the consequences in the infraconstitutional legislation system, concerning its consolidation, distortion and/ or disassemble. Moreover, considering the national historic context related to the theme in analysis, the study will discuss the political and economic circumstances that resulted in (dis)articulation of the precepts, principles, social rights and social security garantees originally set out in the CF/88.

Las detenciones preventivas que deben ajustarse a los criterios de excepcionalidad son por desgracia cada vez más utilizados por los jueces de renombre injustificadamente y sin justificación , especialmente cuando se trata de la detención preventiva. Esto por sí solo se convierte en una paradoja, teniendo en cuenta que se ignora flagrantemente el principio constitucional de un estado de inocencia , un corolario del derecho fundamental a la libertad personal que debe guiar todo proceso penal. En el contexto de los derechos y garantías fundamentales expresado principio de que , a su vez , el modelo de garantismo penal Luigi Ferrajoli , en que se trata de una garantía constitucional del acusado a ser tratado como inocente en una investigación o enjuiciamiento , y no como culpable con el fin de que ninguna culpa se asume y sólo puede ser resultado de una condena penal e inapelable . De lo contrario , no hay necesidad de hablar de la culpa , entonces la presunción de culpabilidad será ilegítimo y no puede servir para justificar el derecho penal , instituto procesal , como la prisión provisional o de protección.

Mismo no havendo unanimidad sobre la tematica, se puede decir que el momento actual es posmoderna. Así, la sociedad en su multicomplexidade también es posmoderna. Las diversas transformaciones sociales, económicos y políticos, tales como la fluidez de los vínculos emocionales, las prácticas comerciales intercontinentales, el poder de los medios televisivos, la dependencia de la información y las alternativas que ofrece la Internet, la desaparición de la idea de la soberanía estatal, la cultura el miedo, las prácticas represivas legítimamente criminal, sólo dan fe de que está a la altura de una nueva era, aún en construcción, lleno de nuevas ideas, nuevos conceptos y paradigmas diferentes de los modernos. Lo directo, como uno de los sectores que conforman la realidad social, se adepta a los cambios políticos, económicos y sociales que se producen a diario. Por lo tanto, la positividad de la norma, también han pasado por transformaciones, y poseen el sistema legal actualmente característica de la pluralidad y normas multicomplexidade. En este contexto, se pretende señalar algunos de los efectos represivos de la postmodernidad en la ley penal brasileña, especialmente en lo que respecta a la devolución de la legitimidad de la teoría retribucionista de la pena.

Desde el aumento de la velocidad del proceso administrativo y judicial como garantía fundamental, observamos una demanda clara para la prestación de los Procedimientos de tutela efectiva y rápida. En este sentido, existe la acusación de algunas reformas legislativas observadas dentro de las numerosas jurisdicciones con el fin de tener una eficacia rápida, dotado de velocidad. Resulta que la propuesta que se presta, entender el análisis de la velocidad bajo el sesgo garantía fundamental para ser considerado junto con otras otras garantías procesales reconocidas constitucionalmente. Por otra parte, como se indica en el título, la investigación propuesta se limitará al análisis de celeridad en los procesos administrativos tributarios establecidos en el ordenamiento jurídico de Uberlândia. Así, las hipótesis señaladas, el proceso buscarán evidencia, sobre todo por el análisis legislativo, e incluso procesal cosechado a lo largo de la Procuraduría General de la Municipalidad de Uberlândia.

La società contemporanea, chiamata società del rischio, segnata da numerosi impatti quali la globalizzazione, il multiculturalismo e la diversità, caratterizzati da numerosi cambiamenti di paradigma nel campo della conoscenza umana. In questo contesto, il Diritto Penale, come strumento di controllo sociale, deve avere difficoltà a dare risposte efficaci alle conflitti atualli. Con il tempo le loro linee basilari sono state elaborate, il Diritto Penale non conosceva il rischio così com\'è oggi. La trasposizione di prevenire nuovi rischi per il sistema di giustizia penale ha portato a un crollo al campo di funzionamento delle strutture e delle istituzioni, che sono stati modellati da l\'idea di un Diritto Penale classico della natura individualistica e guidato il modello liberale della costruzione del sistema borghese legale. Di conseguenza, si discute il ruolo attualmente effettivo del Diritto Penale, chiedendo la messa in discussione dei suoi fondamenti e la validità dei loro confini formali e materiali. Nella società contemporanea, l\'emergere di nuovi rischi e di valorizzazione del legislativo esistente ha generato la proliferazione di reati di pericolo astratto, che è diventato il modello preferito del legislatore per perseguire una politica criminale di anticipo di rilievo penale. Questo fenomeno ha portato difficoltà alla dogmatiche penali del più diverse, dal momento che la legittimità di tali reati è oggetto di infinite polemiche, sia nella dottrina e nel paese straniero. A questo punto, la necessità di indagare il tema di questo lavoro: cercare motivi per il reato di pericolo astratto è legittimo all\'interno della società del rischio e di uno Stato Democratico di Diritto, a favore di un Diritto Penale funzionalizzato ed efficace, guidato dalla tutela degli interessi giuridici necessari per garantire la dignità della persona umana. Servire per la preparazione di questo studio, per lo più quelli, la ricerca teorica o bibliografica, attraverso un sondaggio di grandi opere (libri, articoli, tesi, tesi di laurea e riviste) entrambi autori nazionali e stranieri.

The theme of extrafiscality underlies a lot of political, legal and economic issues. In the Law, it‟s questioned the possibility of relativizing the ability to pay through the forceful use of taxes for purposes other than the collection. In the jurisprudence of the brazillian Supreme Court, this debate tending to establish limits on extrafiscality is still incipient, figuring obscure the freedom of the legislature to build his economic policies. In this pillar, it attempted to build, through the bibliographical and documental research, a proposal that addresses the control parameters of extrafiscal measures‟ validity using the tools available to the juridical system. By the hypothetical-deductive method, it is argued that any measure that imports the relativisation of the fundamental right to equality marked by the ability to pay needs to be grounded in the Constitution and be rationally justified by the legislature. The legislative partial omissions, which are the major challenge in the harvest of the effectuation of equality, are not credited as immune from judicial review, deserving customized legal solutions in order to harmonize the principles of fair taxation due to budgetary legal certainty.

Esta investigación tiene como objetivo analizar la retrospectiva histórica de homoafetivo, objeto de discriminación en el pasado y en los días hodiernos y comprobar si lo había, de hecho, los cambios significativos en relación con el tratamiento de estas personas, tales como la ejecución de algunos derechos inherentes a todos los ciudadanos. Se pretende comprobar si el legislativo, el ejecutivo y el judicial contribuyen a la integración de estas personas. Si es así, tratamos de saber qué papel juega cada uno de energía para construir una lógica más igualitaria y democrática, donde se mide la incorporación de ciudadanos de la sociedad homoafetivo. El alcance de este trabajo es también para demostrar lo importante que es la inclusión de la diversidad sexual como un derecho fundamental, se cree que a partir de este anexo tendrá el homosexual sus derechos básicos garantizados, dado que la orientación sexual de cada persona ya no será decisiva para asegurar sus derechos.